Sorta like how Material Design for Google is all about making a consistent design across all apps on all types of form factors. I really hope they just dump using the current Win32 apps and make everything an app. I guess I just find it odd that a company as large as Microsoft somehow can't balance the essentials that need to be done (obviously this comes first and foremost) with the minor issues that would really help to give Win9 a great first impression. So even the oldest OS X applications look and feel in place in Yosemite. Yosemite isn't even released yet and already, it has updated graphics and design. It's one of the things that Apple does every well. ![]() I hope some of that has changed, because that's quite sad. And that the various departments don't work together, like the Windows team and Office team. I seem to actually recall that Microsoft doesn't even have a dedicated team of graphic designers. Not to mention, changing up graphics isn't hard, given that in the past, those changes usually appeared around the RC stage. Why doesn't Microsoft have a team of graphic designers whose job is to provide unified icons and ensure all areas of the OS function in a similar manner, in accordance with the HIG that Microsoft updated for the Vista era? I don't think expecting an OS to look and function in a similar fashion from one app to another is too much to ask. If bad icons are intentionally being left in for the purpose you stated, I'm sorry, that's just really, really stupid on Microsoft's part.Īnd I realize updating icons and other aspects of the OS isn't a high priority, which brings me to a point I've asked before. Heck the whole screen saver is pretty deprecated as a function. Proper resource allocation, making these things "pretty" isn't it. and the sections are also used so rarely even by professionals, it doesn't serve any meaning to make them pretty, especially when they are in an UI that's being deprecated anyway. so it keeps idiots out of areas they shouldn't be messing. It was also redundant and left in for obscure backwards compatibility, it wasn't really needed anymore.Īnd bad icons actually server a purpose, somehow regular users don't think they should go places that don't look pretty. It was changed in 7, but only because Microsoft got so much ridicule for never bothering to get rid of it in the first place. It's like when Vista was still using the Win3x font installer. ![]() Will it open inline, will it spawn its own window? Will it look like it belongs in the OS or will it be a holdover from an earlier time? It's 2014 and I still have no idea how any given element in Windows will look or work. First impressions are important, but so is consistency. And what annoys me is Microsoft surely knows these things exist, and yet seemingly has no interest whatsoever in fixing them. Should we start a thread for just inconsistencies? What really annoys me is the User Accounts icon in Control Panel, the ugly outdated interface of Disk Management (and other built-in OS management programs), and Performance Options, there must be a way to better organize all the performance options.Īlso, while I was digging around in the User Accounts in CP, on the left pane I opened Change my environment variables and Configure advanced user properties to find the old battleship grey popping up in the obscure dialogue/window.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |